A Constitutional Standstill: SCOTUS Deadlock Leaves Oklahoma Religious Charter School Blocked
The intersection of faith and public education hit a constitutional wall last week, as the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 4-4 split on whether Oklahoma could approve a publicly funded, religious virtual charter school—a case that could have redrawn the boundary between church and state in public education. With Justice Amy Coney Barrett recused, the tie means the Oklahoma Supreme Court’s decision blocking the Catholic school remains intact—a ruling that’s binding only in Oklahoma, but nationally significant nonetheless.
📚 The Backstory: A Virtual School with a Sacred Mission
In 2023, the Oklahoma Statewide Virtual Charter School Board gave the green light to a proposal from the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City and the Diocese of Tulsa to establish St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School—named after the patron saint of the internet. This wouldn’t just be another online school. It would be overtly Catholic and designed to further “the evangelizing mission of the church.”
Crucially, the school’s charter contract included the right to freely exercise its religious beliefs. This marked a radical shift: a religious school, fully funded by taxpayers, operating under a public charter. Supporters hailed it as a bold exercise in religious liberty and school choice. Critics called it a clear violation of the separation between church and state.
⚖️ The Legal Challenge: Religion Meets Public Policy
Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond, a Republican, swiftly challenged the contract. He argued that a religious institution cannot serve as a public charter school, as that would violate both state law and the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
The Oklahoma Supreme Court agreed, invalidating the contract and declaring that public schools must be non-sectarian. Their decision emphasized that allowing St. Isidore to proceed would essentially mean taxpayer money was being used to fund religious indoctrination—a direct affront to the state constitution’s prohibition against using public funds to support religious institutions.
🏛️ Enter SCOTUS: A Test of Prior Precedents
The case advanced to the U.S. Supreme Court, where St. Isidore’s supporters invoked a trio of recent decisions in which the Court had sided with religious institutions denied access to education-related public benefits:
- Trinity Lutheran (2017): Missouri violated the Constitution by denying a church preschool participation in a playground resurfacing program.
- Espinoza v. Montana (2020): Montana couldn’t bar religious schools from a tax-credit scholarship program.
- Carson v. Makin (2022): Maine’s exclusion of religious schools from a public tuition program was unconstitutional.
But as Chief Justice John Roberts noted during oral arguments on April 30, St. Isidore’s case was fundamentally different. In those previous rulings, religious schools remained private; here, a religious institution was attempting to become a public school.
Roberts emphasized that public charter schools in Oklahoma are state actors, subject to extensive oversight, curriculum requirements, and accountability measures—a “comprehensive involvement” by the state, far beyond the programs at issue in past cases.
⚖️ The Justices Weigh In
The justices wrestled with the implications:
- Justice Elena Kagan worried that ruling in favor of St. Isidore would open the door to public schools that diverge wildly from accepted educational norms, so long as they are religious.
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh voiced concern over a ruling against the school possibly jeopardizing faith-based service providers—like Catholic Charities—who partner with government programs.
This tension between Establishment Clause boundaries and Free Exercise rights remains one of the Court’s thorniest areas of modern jurisprudence.
🚫 Barrett Recused, Court Splits
Justice Amy Coney Barrett recused herself from the case without explanation. However, her prior teaching role at Notre Dame Law School, where the Religious Liberty Initiative representing the school is housed, and her personal relationship with law professor Nicole Stelle Garnett (a key advocate for religious charter schools), likely influenced the decision.
With Barrett out, the Court deadlocked 4-4. The one-sentence per curiam order offers no insight into how each justice voted, but the outcome is clear: the Oklahoma Supreme Court’s decision stands, and St. Isidore remains blocked from opening.
📍 What’s Next?
Although this ruling has no national precedential value, it’s a clear signal that the Supreme Court is deeply divided on whether religious institutions can operate public charter schools. The decision could discourage similar applications in other states, at least until a full bench weighs in on a similar case in the future.
For now, church-state separation prevails in Oklahoma, but the broader legal battle over faith-based access to public education funding is far from over.
#SCOTUS #EducationLaw #FirstAmendment #CharterSchools #ReligiousFreedom #SeparationOfChurchAndState #StIsidoreCase #ConstitutionalLaw #LegalNews #LawStudents #ReligiousLiberty #PublicSchoolLaw
lawrota.com 
Leave a comment