lawrota.com

In a recent report by the Telegraph, the UK court’s decision to compel the Vatican to surrender private texts and emails has added an intriguing layer to an already sensational legal saga. The order stems from a lawsuit initiated by Raffaele Mincione, a key figure in the Vatican’s protracted legal battle. Initially filed in June 2020, Mincione accused the Vatican’s Secretariat of State of damaging his reputation, prompting the UK court to delay proceedings until the Vatican trial’s conclusion. However, a pivotal reversal in July 2022 paved the way for the recent ruling.

At the heart of this legal entanglement lies the controversial purchase of a former Harrod’s warehouse in London, a transaction that has become the focal point of the Vatican prosecution. Mincione and his Athena Capital Fund sought access to confidential communications, including emails and messages exchanged on platforms like WhatsApp, Signal, and Telegram, between Cardinal Parolin and Archbishop Peña Parra. The Vatican, in response, asserted the inviolability of the “pontifical secret,” with a witness statement from Father Carlos Fernando Diaz Paniagua emphasizing that breaching this secrecy would constitute a “grave sin.”

While sovereign immunity typically shields states from divulging confidential materials in foreign courts, exceptions exist for commercial activities on foreign soil. Diaz Paniagua argued that it was unreasonable and disproportionate to demand the surrender of documents from Cardinal Parolin, citing his “peripheral role” in the London deal. However, revelations surfaced contradicting this claim, exposing Parolin’s significant involvement, including requesting a $165 million loan from the Vatican bank to extricate the Secretariat of State from a high-interest mortgage related to the London purchase.

Raffaele Mincione expressed satisfaction with the court’s decision, stating that the Vatican’s attempts to conceal communications had failed. He emphasized his innocence in the transaction and called for the complete disclosure of facts in this peculiar case.

As the legal drama unfolds, the Vatican’s stance on whether to appeal the ruling remains unclear. Meanwhile, Mincione’s lawyers are gearing up to present their closing arguments in the Vatican prosecution, scheduled for December 4 and 5. The three-judge panel overseeing the case will also hear from attorneys representing Italian Cardinal Angelo Becciu, the predecessor to Archbishop Peña Parra, facing charges not only in the London affair but also in two other unrelated instances of financial misconduct.

This latest development echoes a prior instance in March 2021, when a UK court examined the Vatican’s prosecution of defendants in the London deal. Judge Tony Baumgartner criticized the Vatican’s filings, deeming them full of “non-disclosures and misrepresentations,” ultimately reversing an order for asset seizure against another Italian financier, Gianluigi Torzi.

#VaticanTrial #LegalDrama #ConfidentialityBattle #LondonDeal